home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sfov1.verifone.com!jeff_w1
- From: jeff_w1@sfov1.verifone.com (Jeff Wahaus, CAPS, ATL, x3529)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: EDO RAM on March Amiga?
- Message-ID: <1996Jan23.064209.4756@sfov1.verifone.com>
- Date: 23 Jan 96 06:42:09 -0800
- References: <wfblanDKzuKL.IC4@netcom.com> <4d8ovm$tp4@coranto.ucs.mun.ca> <xAAvYMD42Dacz9@j-plewka.amtrash.comlink.de>
- Organization: VeriFone Inc.
-
- In article <xAAvYMD42Dacz9@j-plewka.amtrash.comlink.de>, J_Plewka@Amtrash.comlink.de (Joern Plewka) writes:
- > bmontgom@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Byron Montgomerie) -> "Re: EDO RAM on March Amiga?"
- > (13.01.1996)
- >> Maxwell Daymon (mdaymon@rainbow.rmii.com) wrote:
- >>
- >> : Someone with an ASUS (256K, pipelined burst sync) said after adding EDO
- >> : RAM his computer improved by as much as 10 or 15% in some areas
- >> : (including the bench done by Norton SysInfo).
- >>
- >> Gee, that much eh? :) Interesting to people to like to compare stats but you
- >> would never notice it in use. :) Kind of like replacing an 68000 with a 68010.
- >> I don't think it warrants the extra dollars.
- >
- > Exactly my opinion...why special modules for extra money?
- > 10-15%...there is a $40 difference in price when comparing 68040-25
- > and 68040-33....a little more than 10% faster ;-(
- >
-
- Umm... do your math! A 33MHz part is 33% faster than a 25MHz part not 10%.
-
-
-